Liberal Studies at IUP: Background and Development The Appointment of a General Education Revision CommitteeIn September 1985, the IUP president appointed a committee to review the University's general education core. The "General Education Task Force" consisted of twelve professors, two academic deans, two students, and one student affairs administrator. This committee was charged with establishing goals for general education at IUP, evaluating the existing program's effectiveness in achieving the goals, and recommending necessary changes. In May 1987, the University Senate approved a proposal to replace the General Education requirements with a new Liberal Studies (LS) program. More than 100 members of the IUP community worked as subcommittee members on the new LS program. Reasons for Change Significant discussion concerning the existing General Education (GE) program took place at IUP prior to the appointment of this committee. IUP's existing General Education program was nearly twenty years old and a consensus existed that it needed to be modified. The Student Government Association studied the GE requirements and recommended reconsideration of general education in April 1985. The local discussion was advanced by an awareness that concern about the quality of undergraduate education was widespread across the United States. During the two years prior to the establishment of this task force, three major national reports gave focus and impetus to the emerging discussion. All of these reports included a plea for a stronger, more coherent general education program. The task force's review of the existing GE program concluded that the undergraduate core curriculum could be strengthened and improved. The old curriculum placed much reliance on choice and chance. It was possible for a student to put together a good program, and many students did; it was also possible to end up with an unbalanced one. It was possible, for instance, for students to take all introductory level courses, or to have no writing experiences beyond English composition classes, or to avoid broad areas of study such as philosophy or history, or to leave IUP without any exposure to a culture other than their own. It was also true that curriculum areas were not always labeled to indicate how these areas fit into a program designed to produce broadly educated people. The task force's final report included certain key features:
Liberal Studies and IUP's Mission Statement The IUP Mission Statement (that was in effect when the the Liberal Studies program was assessed by Middle States in 1995) committed the University to an undergraduate education "that balances breadth and depth"; while major programs provide depth, the Liberal Studies component gives breadth. It does so by requiring study in each major area of knowledge--humanities (literature, history, and philosophy or religious studies), fine arts, natural sciences, social sciences, and health and wellness. The Liberal Studies
program, as expressed by its goals and realized in its
implementation, addresses several objectives in the
Mission Statement. Table 1: IUP's mission statement and its relationship to the IUP Liberal Studies ProgramIUP Mission
Statement: "a positive attitude toward
learning and intellectual pursuits" IUP Liberal Studies Program IUP Mission
Statement: "a deeper level of
self-understanding" IUP Liberal Studies Program IUP Mission
Statement: "a global understanding and
respect for people from diverse backgrounds and
cultures" IUP Liberal Studies ProgramIUP Mission Statement: "think critically,...reason logically, analyze complex information, and make decisions" IUP Liberal Studies Program IUP Mission
Statement: "communicate effectively" IUP Liberal Studies Program IUP Mission
Statement: "sensitivity to an appreciation
of various art forms" IUP Liberal Studies Program IUP Mission
Statement: "necessary skills for success
in their careers" IUP Liberal Studies Program IUP Mission
Statement: "commitment to public
service" IUP Liberal Studies Program Liberal Studies and "Priorities for Pennsylvania's SSHE during the 1990s" IUP's Liberal Studies
revision anticipated the publication of the SSHE
Priorities document as evidenced by noticeable
similarities between the two, both in intent and
language, although the SSHE document retains the name
"General Education." Table 2. SSHE Priorities and its relationship to the IUP Liberal Studies ProgramSSHE Priorities:
7-A. Goals for General Education IUP Liberal Studies: SSHE Priorities:
7-B. "...all students are introduced to the nature
and purpose of a liberal education...." IUP Liberal Studies: SSHE Priorities:
7-C,D. Ongoing review and assessment IUP Liberal Studies: SSHE Priorities:
8-A. Problem-solving, critical thinking, communication
skills IUP Liberal Studies: SSHE Priorities:
8-B. "Relationships among academic
disciplines" IUP Liberal Studies: SSHE Priorities: 8-C. "general understanding of American society and culture and of at least one non-Western country, culture, or perspective." IUP Liberal Studies: SSHE Priorities:
8-D. "political, economic, social, and ecological
global interdependence" IUP Liberal Studies: SSHE Priorities:
8-E. Foreign Language IUP Liberal Studies: SSHE Priorities:
8-G. Contributions of women and minorities IUP Liberal Studies: SSHE Priorities:
8-H. "sufficient understanding of science" IUP Liberal Studies: SSHE Priorities:
8-I; 9. Ethical Dimension/Values IUP Liberal Studies: Development, Review, and Approval of Liberal Studies Courses The Senate's approval of a new Liberal Studies program in 1987 related only to goals and the curriculum outline. The following academic year, 11 working groups of faculty, administrators, and students (approximately 125 people) wrote detailed criteria for courses in each curriculum category; members of the General Education Task Force wrote general criteria that applied to all Liberal Studies courses. These criteria were approved by the University Senate in May 1988 and February 1989 [a revised set of writing-across-the-curriculum criteria was approved December 1992]. Courses must meet these criteria in order to be listed within a particular category. The Liberal Studies Committee approves each course proposal and ensures that these criteria are met. Course proposals are initiated by faculty, either individually or as teams. Proposals are reviewed by departments and colleges prior to review by the LSC, which submits its recommendations through the University-wide Undergraduate Curriculum Committee to the Senate for approval; LSC recommendations about writing-intensive sections or sections of LBST 499 Synthesis are submitted for information. In order to ensure compliance with the criteria, the LSC examines the course syllabus, responses to questions, and checklists tailored to the specific curriculum category; in the case of writing intensive courses, sample assignments are also reviewed. Customarily, the LSC meets with the proposer(s) to discuss the course prior to making a decision. Copies of the proposals are filed in the LS office. Role and Responsibilities of Director of Liberal Studies and Liberal Studies Committee In addition to their roles in course approval noted above, the Director and the Committee are charged with the responsibility for Liberal Studies policy and for ongoing program review. The Director is also an advocate for the program, an organizer of related faculty development activities, and the day-to-day administrator of the program. The past and current directors of the Liberal Studies Program have also been successful in attracting external monies to support such programs as new faculty orientation workshops, synthesis workshops, cooperative learning workshops, and use of student portfolios for assessment. Other faculty professional development activities supported by the LS Office include workshops on diversity, writing-across-the-curriculum, and gender-balancing the curriculum. The LS Office also cosponsors guest speakers and fine arts productions. The Director of Liberal Studies speaks to entering students (first year, transfer, international) at orientation meetings and discusses with them the purpose and value of the LS Program. Each student, and each parent attending parent orientation, receives a copy of Liberal Studies and You, a brochure interpreting the program; a separate interpretive brochure is distributed to juniors as they approach the Senior Synthesis course. The Director works with advisers to encourage reinforcement of these messages at new faculty orientation and advisers' meetings. Each approved Senior Synthesis course outline includes an opening discussion of the purpose and value of this course and of Liberal Studies in general. Numerous faculty include similar discussions at the beginning of other Liberal Studies courses. Last Modified Friday February 08 2008 |
Correspondence regarding this site should be sent to its maintainer, Sharon Aikins, <saikins@iup.edu> . Please see IUP's statement regarding pages that do not officially represent the university.