Forrest Lehman
English Major
Class of 2001
"During Spring
Break of my freshman year, when I talked to high school friends
who had gone to other schools about what they were doing, they
would say 'Oh, I'm taking this course.'
Then I told them that
in March we were examining 'How do humans understand the sacred?'
from the perspective of literature, history, philosophy and the
fine arts, and that I've just finished my fourth major critical
paper; their jaws hit the table."
"They were in
awe. They just go to class and come back. They aren't tackling
these things."
"It's interesting
the way all the sections attack the questions from different angles
and the way we all get together at the end to learn how everyone
looked at them. Even during the middle of the unit we get into
discussions in the hallways and in our rooms- 'How are you guys
looking at the question? What are you learning?' Though you are
in one disciplinary unit, it's as if you are in all of them at
the same time. The synthesis is really valuable."
"I'm happy, and
feel I'm getting something out of college that my friends aren't.
The whole interdisciplinary design of the course around major
questions that touch all humans, the focus on thinking and writing,
and the kind of interaction with faculty and students I've experienced
in the Honors College core course has been a real awakening for
me. In order to function in a society, you have to be open-minded
and look at all sides of an issue, to realize that not everyone
agrees, but you have to go beyond that and recognize which positions
are more or less valid, what the best answers are."
Shauna Doyle 
Hearing Impaired and History Major
Class of 2002:
"I like to interact with the material. I care more about
things I have to learn interactively. The design of the course
contributes a lot. If a course is designed around problem solving,
it's going to be more fun and interesting. My brain is going to
grow just by thinking about it. If the design is just information,
even if you get into groups once in awhile, there's not much to
think about. Just framing the course around a problem or question
makes a big difference. You still learn specifics, still master
the material, but it comes alive."
Lori Felker,
English Major
Fulbright Scholar
Class of 2000:
"There are other courses with interdisciplinary content,
but it's the combination of the interdisciplinary approach to
questions like 'What is Art?' and the critical discussion-based
teaching approach that makes the difference. The organization
of the course around questions like 'How do we discern the good
from the bad' changes everything. Instead of learning something
pre-digested about a single discipline like
history, you start to see what history contributes to life's big
questions. It's a group of professors and students looking for
a synthesis rather than a teacher giving information to offer
an answer. You have to have different people giving answers to
truly understand, and there are often even more questions when
you are done."
"That gives me more enlightenment, not less. Without critical
thinking it would just be a jumble of feelings, so that's part
of the synthesis too-evaluating other arguments. And it doesn't
shortchange the single discipline like, for example, history-I've
come to see how a historian thinks and even to recognize how that's
different from the way philosophers think."
"The core course has patterned for me for me how it should
happen in real life. With in-depth critical thinking and discussions
that push way beyond how people 'feel' into real thinking and
analysis, you begin to make connections. It seems abstract, but
it's very relevant. The core course was the spark and the initial
exercise that trained my mind to be analytical, critical, but
also open to other ideas. Now I see
connections all the time. I don't have to stretch to bring art
into history. And it keeps going after the term is over, even
at home."
Eric Boyer
Political Science and Philosophy Major
Class of 2001:
"The core class has shown me that the foundation of knowledge
that is meant to be built by any liberal studies or general education
program cannot be truly accomplished without taking classes that
are independent of each other. Like in the human body, where individual
cells combine to make organs, and organs interact to
make us who we are, the core class creates a system in which all
the disciplines interact with each other. This interaction around
deep and thought-provoking
questions challenges our minds in ways no other class has.
Beth Baran 
Management and English Major
Class of 2000:
"Education cannot be approached from a singular point of
view. This curriculum has changed me and the way I think. I became
a diff e rent thinker. Everything I thought I knew and took for
granted now seems shallow without critical analysis to support
it."
"The purpose of Liberal Studies is to foster well-roundedness
in students' education. When I'm writing for the core class, I'm
incorporating elements of history, philosophy, fine arts, religious
studies and literature. I don't know that I would be able to synthesize
all or even some of them into the writings if I were in a typical
class independent of other disciplines. I recall John Locke's
theory on government, and it helps with analysis of Keats' works.
I've used history articles in literature units. We are learning
a set of skills and a way of looking at things as connected."
"This whole environment just fosters growth. We all want
to get our degrees and jobs, and even money, but we also want
to become more open people, to develop as citizens and gain a
greater appreciation of how it all fits together."
Cameron Hollingshead
Political Science Pre-Law Major
Class of 2003:
"Until studying here, I thought of education simply as following
the dots along a line. After Core, and classes in various disciplines
and around the world, I see that education is better characterized
as a detailed map that demonstrates the contours of competing
ideas, change over time, relations between disciplines, the elevation
of ideals, and the bedrock of facts, ethics, and logic. On content
alone, Honors Core makes us examine our existing map and make
room for new and different knowledge, often at the expense of
unacknowledged prejudice or willful ignorance. I testify that
the best attribute of the Honors College-an attribute everyone
should seek everywhere and always-is that in guiding you by your
map, the faculty will have none but your interest in mind."
Joanna Stone 
Spanish and Anthropology Major
Class of 2003:
"The Core class teaches you the relevance of art. I'm
not in an art field and I think that I always thought about art
as the icing on the cake, the frivolous stuff that you didn't
really have to do. Especially the "what is art?" question
and going to fine arts events, made me realize how integral to
life it is. Though it may not be part of my daily life, it was
and is part of a lot of people's lives. It has so much to say
about society, as an agent in society as well. I thought that
was really important as an educated person."
Kathryn Bransford
English and Spanish Education Major
Class of 2004:
"The Core course fit with what I craved in high school:
when I was a prospective student, particularly in my senior year,
I was frustrated with an AP English class in which the teacher
seemed fascinated with the sound of his own voice, seldom valuing
any dissent among students. I often felt the urge to show him
the HC curriculum outlines as if to say, "Look! Some college
classes emphasize the teacher's learning as much as that of the
students, and everybody wins with that tactic." I am still
thrilled with the dynamic discussions we have in Core and the
continuations thereof throughout our days at IUP."
Megan Dively
Political Science Major
Class of 2003:
"This isn't a place for students who need an intellectual
safety zone. It's a place for people who relish having their ideas
challenged and who have the moral courage to revise beliefs as
experience demonstrates their flaws. It's a place for people who
always think of the "but" and the "what if"
and who wonder what experiences and ideas motivate others who
may be very different from themselves. The intellectual free spirit
inside me had been carefully fed a bland diet in high school;
I dialogued with my Newsweeks and novels and with my own head
more than I ever did with others. Nothing I'd experienced before
was like the first week at the HC. I felt like I'd been led to
a buffet of wildly exciting new thoughts coming from some really
passionate, diversely-minded people. The wonder of it was the
unwritten code that you could casually or vigorously debate or
discuss anything at any time, but that judging or insulting the
person was utter bad form. Now, I literally feel choked when I'm
in an environment with rigid, homogeneous thought."
Core Curriculum
|